Early next year Tasmania is likely to have a new Minister for Education. The Minister will promise a better future for Tasmanian education. If this is to be achieved, the new Minister will need to avoid the traps into which the current and recent Minsters and senior bureaucrats have fallen. So the key question is...
“By what
method?” (Deming)
Core Method:
-
Operate consistently on the basis of (explicit, agreed) principles (Covey,... Webb)
Some principles for
consideration
Core goals: Success & well-being for all now and in the
future
Use low cost, low risk (safe-fail), potentially high return
initiatives (Snowden)
Maximise improvement while minimising change
Maximise improvement while minimising change
Provide principle-based authority and responsibility -
shared accountability
Address the current constraint (Goldratt)
Make things easier first
Address the current constraint (Goldratt)
Make things easier first
Adopt a common “job description” for all involved; staff,
students, families… e.g.,
o
Know what's
happening
o
Work with others to
improve what is happening
o
Make it easier for the
next person to do well (Webb)
Rationale
Our knowledge, actions, arrangements, relationships
and organisation emerge from (everyday) interactions (complexity
theory)
"If you understand the
principles... you can choose your own method" (Gaping Void)
A principle-based approach is
sustainable
Consistent sharing of authority and responsibility
Sound principles are widely applicable (DoE, other schools and services...)
Sound principles change only slowly co-evolving with the context
A well understood set of principles provides coherence
A well understood set of principles provides coherence
Moves the focus from driving to enabling
Attracts minimal tampering and
disruption
Promotes initiative and
commitment
Minimises cost
- Enables and promotes local and system-wide
initiatives
- Promotes action learning and continuous improvement
- Builds and attracts social
capital
- Flexible and adaptive - provides basis for
customisation
- Achieves consistency without requiring
uniformity
- Responsive to opportunities
It works
Big Picture schools and the Coalition of Essential Schools are other great examples of very successful principle based school systems
Common recent traps that can be avoided using a
principle-based approach
Confusing drivers and enablers (eg, Naplan with delayed results)
Confusing plans, policies and standards with actual performance
Confusing change with improvement
Confusing change with improvement
Confusing additional resources with
improvement
Confusing structural change with
improvement
Relying on command and control management (compliance)
Ignoring the real starting point – the individual
student in his/her current
context
[Note: There is nothing wrong with programs, plans, policies, standards, resources... Indeed they can be very useful, if implemented in the right context using sound principles. They should not be assumed to be drivers (causal) despite their successful use elsewhere. At best, they may be useful interim enablers in some contexts.]
No comments:
Post a Comment